At present different disciplines approach the happiness and in some cases and are linked to education, from the 50’s humanistic psychology Carl Rogers proposed a different learning, not based on data, memorization or knowledge but on learning that permeate the whole person and change their actions. (Rogers, 1996). In the current educational psychology and constructivism and cultural psychology the concept of open learning and include subjective aspects of the students who should have impact on educational practice with the aim of achieving greater prosperity and happiness as the social-emotional imbalance and deficits at maturity, are directly related to high rates of school failure.

For its part, science, put on the scale of happiness and located in the human brain, arguing that like everything else, you can learn and develop. You will find uses and health benefits for the optimization work, and of course for learning and is from utilitarian approach comes a powerful reason for happiness and education begin to touch, later clarifying that talk about levels of happiness. In science we find great contributions as that of Dr. Patch Adams, who realizes that the closure of happiness in education has come to cause problems of dehumanization and health problems. (Adams, 2009).

Positive psychology promoted by Anglo seek psychological currents of postmodern man welfare and development of human potential, opposing the negative psychology focused almost exclusively on pathologies and traumas, Dr. Seligman is one of the most prestigious neuroscientists and argues that true happiness is not only possible but far from being dependent on the fate or genes, can be cultivated by identifying their strengths and traits that already possess.